Kuznets Inverted U Hypothesis Pdf Download > urlin.us/4sjud
74309d7132 "Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement". Dobson and Ramlogans research looked to identify the relationship between inequality and trade liberalization. There have been mixed findings with this idea some developing countries have experienced greater inequality, less inequality, or no difference at all, due to trade liberalization. This could be a reason why environmental Kuznets curves have been found to be applicable to only certain types of pollutants.[4] Yandle et al. "The Richer-Is-Greener Curve". "[T]he statistical evidence for the upwards side of the 'Inverted-U' between inequality and income per capita seems to have vanished, as many low and low-middle income countries now have a distribution of income similar to that of most middle-income countries (other than those of Latin America and Southern Africa). Retrieved 18 June 2015. argue that the EKC has not been found to apply to carbon because most pollutants create localized problems like lead and sulfur, so there is a greater urgency and response to cleaning up such pollutants. doi:10.1016/s0304-3878(98)00099-6.
"New Ways of Looking at Old Issues: Inequality and Growth". Instead, we get a more realistic view of the effect of economic growth and technological changes on environmental quality. Kuznets believed that inequality would follow an inverted U shape as it rises and then falls again with the increase of income per-capita.[3]. "Confronting the Environmental Kuznets Curve". 1994. Empirically observed curves aren't smooth or symmetricalsee reference[1] for examples of "real" curves. Wealthy nations have a trend of exporting the activities that create the most pollution, like manufacturing of clothing and furniture, to poorer nations that are still in the process of industrial development (Suri and Chapman, 1998).
Warrjerri replied
452 weeks ago